They were, perhaps, driven a considei-able
way to a port of embarkation, huddled into ships, taken across
the seas, exposed to great heat and suffering on board shi|) ;
they were taken ashore, put into ti'ucks in which cattle infected
with the same disease had recently travelled (hear, hear), and
thus, both on shipboard and in these trucks, at fairs and other
20
INTRODUCTION.
places of sale, the disease was necessarily propagated. It there-
fore seemed necessary to consider what provisions could be made
to diminish the propagation of the disease from the.se causes.
He need not go into details as to other diseases — the foot and
mouth disease, the scab in sheep, and mea.sles in pigs. He had
stated the number of deaths arising from disease, but that did
not represent the whole extent of the mischief. There was
another point of great social importance connected with this
subject, and that was the question of meat. Within the last
few years the price of beef and mutton had very considerably
increased. Whether that was owing in any considerable extent
to the amount of disease which prevailed among cattle, or
whether it arose from the greater demand for butcher’s meat in
consequence of the increasing prosperity and wealth of the
people, lie could not undertake to decide. Probably the rise in
price was attributable to both causes. An enormous mass of
diseased meat, in various stages of disease, was annually sold.
What the precise quantity was, it would of course be difficult
to estimate. Profe.ssor Gamgee estimated it at one-fifth.
There was no conclusive evidence on the subject, although
there was ample evidence that the quantities were very large,
not only of meat killed while cattle were diseased, but of cattle
which had died without the aid of the butcher. He took the
case where the figures were beyond dispute. The deaths in
dairies were most numerous. In Edinburgh, Professor Gamgee
gave returns from 88 dairies for the year ending 1862. Out of
1,839 cows kept, 1,075 were sold diseased, of which 791 were
sold to butchers, and 284 to be consumed by pigs. In nine
dairies in Dublin, on an average of twenty years, out of
315 cows 161 were sold diseased. In Dublin it was ob-
servable that cows being turned out to grass the greatest
part of the year were healthier than in the great towns.
The loss in London, Manchester, etc., was equally great.
These diseased cows were sold in Dublin fairs at from £2 to £5
each. In London and Edinburgh, where the facilities for sale
were greater, at from £10 to £20. In London, the seizures of
diseased meat were very large, representing probably but a small
part of those killed in a diseased state. He would, on this sub
INTRODUOTIOJI.
21
Page 14
Presented as published in 1891. Historical recipes may not meet modern food-safety standards. Cook from the modern interpretation, not the original instructions.
AI-modernized reading of the original text
They were, perhaps, driven a considerable way to a port of embarkation, huddled into ships, taken across the seas, exposed to great heat and suffering on board ship ; they were taken ashore, put into trucks in which cattle infected with the same disease had recently travelled (hear, hear), and thus, both on shipboard and in these trucks, at fairs and other
places of sale, the disease was necessarily propagated. It therefore seemed necessary to consider what provisions could be made to diminish the propagation of the disease from the.se causes. He need not go into details as to other diseases — the foot and mouth disease, the scab in sheep, and measles in pigs. He had stated the number of deaths arising from disease, but that did not represent the whole extent of the mischief. There was another point of great social importance connected with this subject, and that was the question of meat. Within the last few years the price of beef and mutton had very considerably increased. Whether that was owing in any considerable extent to the amount of disease which prevailed among cattle, or whether it arose from the greater demand for butcher’s meat in consequence of the increasing prosperity and wealth of the people, lie could not undertake to decide. Probably the rise in price was attributable to both causes. An enormous mass of diseased meat, in various stages of disease, was annually sold. What the precise quantity was, it would of course be difficult to estimate. Professor Gamgee estimated it at one-fifth. There was no conclusive evidence on the subject, although there was ample evidence that the quantities were very large, not only of meat killed while cattle were diseased, but of cattle which had died without the aid of the butcher. He took the case where the figures were beyond dispute. The deaths in dairies were most numerous. In Edinburgh, Professor Gamgee gave returns from 88 dairies for the year ending 1862. Out of 1,839 cows kept, 1,075 were sold diseased, of which 791 were sold to butchers, and 284 to be consumed by pigs. In nine dairies in Dublin, on an average of twenty years, out of 315 cows 161 were sold diseased. In Dublin it was observable that cows being turned out to grass the greatest part of the year were healthier than in the great towns. The loss in London, Manchester, etc., was equally great. These diseased cows were sold in Dublin fairs at from £2 to £5 each. In London and Edinburgh, where the facilities for sale were greater, at from £10 to £20. In London, the seizures of diseased meat were very large, representing probably but a small part of those killed in a diseased state. He would, on this sub
INTRODUCTION.