FoodNetArchive

The new practical housekeeping

1890

Page 2

Presented as published in 1890. Historical recipes may not meet modern food-safety standards. Cook from the modern interpretation, not the original instructions.
As the conditions of living improve, there are greater demands upon time in new directions, and it is not only convenient, but a saving of both time and money to have at ready command the simplest and best recipes in cookery and instructions in the best methods in every department of housekeeping. Failures are costly, and experience is always so dearly bought that it is economy to buy the results of thousands of carefully conducted experiments, packed between the covers of a book, rather than waste time and money in trials that may or may not prove successful. The arrangements of subjects treated, whenever practical, has been made in the simple order of the alphabet, and for the sake of still more ready reference a very full alphabetical index has been PREFACi;. added; Whenever a recipe is given within another, by an addition of ingredients, it is indexed and marked by italics; when one recipe which appears elsewhere in the book is referred to in another recipe the foimer begins with a capital letter. The instructions which pre- cede the recipes of each department have been carefully made up^ and are entirely trustworthy, and the recipes themselves are mostly new to print and well indorsed. The instructions should be care- fully read before any recipe, following them, is attempted. Several suggestive articles have also been introduced, which, though not be- longing strictly to cookery, bear such close relations to it that the fiUiess of their apppearance in the connection is evident. What is offered in this volume is practical and useful, the direc- tions are simple and may easily be understood and followed, and the index is so foil and the arrangement so simple that anything wanted may be readily found. It is submitted to the housekeeping public, and more especially to those who have found valuable help in "Prac- tically Housekeeping,'* with confidence that it will be found worthy of constant use in their daily round of duties. BREAD-MAKING. It is said that the original Saxon form of our English word **Lady" meant "Loaf-giver." Essentially, there can be no higher dignity than that which attaches to the woman who is the loaf- giver to th«se who are dependent on her good sense and skill for the daily food which sustains physical life, and it is one of the best indications of the present time, that never more than to-day have women been interested in the quality of the household bread. Everywhere the housewife puts this foremost, as the one thing that must be "good," whatever of failure may be tolerated in other things. It is a commercial fact of the first importance that the American workingman insists (unquestionably at the dictate of his "better half,") upon the first quality of flour in his provision for family needs. That this is sometimes carried to a wasteful and absurd excess is merely due to lack of knowledge, and a consequent wrong standard of excellence. The idea that "whiteness" is the thing in bread, which is primary and fundamental, has led and is constantly leading, to unnecessary expenditure. It depends upon too great a confidence in the sense of sight, as a guide in the choice of food, and is a part of the same delusion which makes us choose the red apple or peach, even when decidedly inferior to less showy sorts.