It had once a very great name, and the probable reason why publicans keep it
and it only, is, that the class of people they as a rule serve, have heard of Moet's
Champagne and of no other. This fact is a practical answer to the question, "What's
in a name 1 "
We have now run through the general wines drunk in this country, viz.. Sherry,
Port, Claret, Burgundy, Hock, Moselle, and Champagne. There is one wine, however,
once most popular, but that of late years seems to have gone out of fashion, and that
is Madeira. There seems, however, a strong probability of this wine coming in again.
The vines in Madeii-a, which so completely failed some few years ago, have very
much recovered. Good old East India Madeira, such as is now rarely to be obtained,
save at a public dinner of some City company, will bear comparison with almost any
wine in the world.
The new Madeira now imported is, for its pxice, really a far cheaper wine than
sherry, the principal drawback to it being it is somewhat sweet. However, in a few
years' time there seems every probability of Madeira recovering its lost position, and
those who possess good cellars might certainly make worse speculations than that of
laying down some of the new Madeira, which they can get at about 48s. a dozen.
There is good sound Madeira to be got at a far cheaper rate.
The objection of sweetness is fatal to a large class of wines, and as the public
taste just now runs upon dry wines, it is a bad time to attempt to introduce any wine
save those that possess this quality. The consumption, for instance, of Sparkling
Hock, Sparkling Moselle, and Sparkling Burgundy is less in proportion than that of
former years, owing to the difficulty of obtaining these wines dry.
Sparkling Hock has too often a tendency to acidity. Sparkling Moselle is a
deliciously-scented wine, but is often sweet. It is what used to be called a ladies'
wine, and I should imagine children would prefer Sparkling Moselle to ordinary
Champagne. At least I am judging of my own feelings and tastes as a child — for in
the present day it seems to me that so-called children acquire tastes for dry wines
and lobster salads before they leave off knickerbockers.
Sparkling Burgundy, when not too sweet, is a magnificent wine, and as its price
is below that of the first brands of Champagne, it is somewhat strange that it is not
more generally drunk.
With i-egard to the order in which wine should be drunk at dinner we have
already alluded. If dinner is preceded by those expensive luxuries, oysters, nothing
can compare with a glass of Chablis. After soup, a glass of sherry ; if the soup be
turtle, a glass of Madeira. After fish, either a dry sheiTy, or should the fish be
rich, such as stewed eels, a glass of old East India sherry. Hock, after light entrees;
and claret or Burgundy after richer entrees. Champagne not too early in the dinner
if diy, and not till late if at all sweet. This seems the fashion in the present day,
CASSELL S DICTIONARY OF COOKERY.
and in long and elaborate dinners is perhaps best. Of course when wine is drunk
freely during dinner, it cannot be drunk freely after dinner. Again, port wine after
dinner when Champagne is drunk with dinner is a mixture which but few persons
can stand. Port is a heavy wine, and after Champagne is very apt to disagree.
Page 109
Presented as published in 1892. Historical recipes may not meet modern food-safety standards. Cook from the modern interpretation, not the original instructions.
AI-modernized reading of the original text
A modernized reading is not available for this page yet. You are seeing the original text.
It had once a very great name, and the probable reason why publicans keep it
and it only, is, that the class of people they as a rule serve, have heard of Moet's
Champagne and of no other. This fact is a practical answer to the question, "What's
in a name 1 "
We have now run through the general wines drunk in this country, viz.. Sherry,
Port, Claret, Burgundy, Hock, Moselle, and Champagne. There is one wine, however,
once most popular, but that of late years seems to have gone out of fashion, and that
is Madeira. There seems, however, a strong probability of this wine coming in again.
The vines in Madeii-a, which so completely failed some few years ago, have very
much recovered. Good old East India Madeira, such as is now rarely to be obtained,
save at a public dinner of some City company, will bear comparison with almost any
wine in the world.
The new Madeira now imported is, for its pxice, really a far cheaper wine than
sherry, the principal drawback to it being it is somewhat sweet. However, in a few
years' time there seems every probability of Madeira recovering its lost position, and
those who possess good cellars might certainly make worse speculations than that of
laying down some of the new Madeira, which they can get at about 48s. a dozen.
There is good sound Madeira to be got at a far cheaper rate.
The objection of sweetness is fatal to a large class of wines, and as the public
taste just now runs upon dry wines, it is a bad time to attempt to introduce any wine
save those that possess this quality. The consumption, for instance, of Sparkling
Hock, Sparkling Moselle, and Sparkling Burgundy is less in proportion than that of
former years, owing to the difficulty of obtaining these wines dry.
Sparkling Hock has too often a tendency to acidity. Sparkling Moselle is a
deliciously-scented wine, but is often sweet. It is what used to be called a ladies'
wine, and I should imagine children would prefer Sparkling Moselle to ordinary
Champagne. At least I am judging of my own feelings and tastes as a child — for in
the present day it seems to me that so-called children acquire tastes for dry wines
and lobster salads before they leave off knickerbockers.
Sparkling Burgundy, when not too sweet, is a magnificent wine, and as its price
is below that of the first brands of Champagne, it is somewhat strange that it is not
more generally drunk.
With i-egard to the order in which wine should be drunk at dinner we have
already alluded. If dinner is preceded by those expensive luxuries, oysters, nothing
can compare with a glass of Chablis. After soup, a glass of sherry ; if the soup be
turtle, a glass of Madeira. After fish, either a dry sheiTy, or should the fish be
rich, such as stewed eels, a glass of old East India sherry. Hock, after light entrees;
and claret or Burgundy after richer entrees. Champagne not too early in the dinner
if diy, and not till late if at all sweet. This seems the fashion in the present day,
CASSELL S DICTIONARY OF COOKERY.
and in long and elaborate dinners is perhaps best. Of course when wine is drunk
freely during dinner, it cannot be drunk freely after dinner. Again, port wine after
dinner when Champagne is drunk with dinner is a mixture which but few persons
can stand. Port is a heavy wine, and after Champagne is very apt to disagree.